Lots of groups! Lots of ideas! Lots of action! ONE great website!
The US Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence are now nothing more than historical documents of no value except that of nostalgic value.
These documents are already being auctioned off. George Washington's personal copy of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights sold for $9.8 million.
Everyone in [America] is independent. The body of law created under the US Constitution is an illusion. This is not however, at this time, stopping the de facto US Government from acting like these historical documents have lost their perceived power.
If you come to find out how these documents lost their force (in the very recent past), then you have some keys to defend your independence and to protect yourself from oppressive illusions of law, which are used to keep you obedient to the de facto government. This may not be as easy as it sounds. You may have to learn some things differently than how you were brainwashed [taught] them in school.
I debated with myself whether or not I would post this information, because of the objections I might receive from others of such claims, or because some may just dismiss it and dismiss anything I may write in the future. However, curiosity got the best of me; and I wonder who else here knows about this. I am reserving my right to not answer any questions on this blog, but that doesn’t mean that I wouldn’t.
[UPDATED INFORMATION FOLLOWS]
I think what visitors here seem to want most is the black and white proof of it. They want to be able to point at that one thing and say “that’s it”, and there’s nothing wrong with that. Unfortunately, I am going to use the grey areas to hopefully lead you to a black and white conclusion. You will not find any law recorded in the public archives that officially verifies that the US Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence is declared void. I have very good reason to believe that those documents are in fact void at this time. There are new versions of all three that are already written and continue to be rewritten to one day replace the historical ones. That’s why I made the statement that at this time the government is de facto. If for no other reason one could easily conclude that the media has been being used to prepare the minds of Americans to embrace and even welcome the changes that are underway. It is a necessary evil for them to have to go through this long and deceiving display to the public to get them onboard with the new Entity. The signs are all around us and the media reports them; if you have eyes to see, then read the signs.
In the case of Libya, President Barack Obama has consulted with congressional leaders, but sought no authorization for his military operation against Col. Moammar Gadhafi's regime.
At a press conference in Chile on Monday Obama gave no indication that he thought any congressional authorization was needed.
Instead of seeking a vote by Congress to affirm his actions, Obama repeatedly cited as his authority the United Nations Security Council resolution passed last week.
This was, he said Monday, “an international mandate from the Security Council that specifically focuses on the humanitarian threat posed by Col. Gadhafi to his own people.” http://www.nbcnews.com/id/42201792/#.URAmbx00WSo
“…the U.N.’s actions to date indicate that the ATT is likely to pose significant threats to our national security, foreign policy, and economic interests as well as our constitutional rights.” The lawmakers adamantly insist that the U.S. Government has no right to support a treaty that violates the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Democrats have accused Republicans of making this a political issue, maintaining that the treaty poses no Second Amendment threat. Others, such as former U.N. ambassador John Bolton, caution gun owners to take this initiative seriously. He believes that the U.N. “is trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about international arms trade between nation states, but there is no doubt that the real agenda here is domestic firearms control.” http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2012/07/10/the-u-n-arms-trade...
In order to provide covert funds for the Kuomintang (KMT) forces loyal to General Chiang Kai-shek, who were fighting the Chinese communists under Mao Zedong, the CIA helped the KMT smuggle opium from China and Burma to Bangkok, Thailand, by providing airplanes owned by one of their front businesses, Air America.
The CIA has been accused of moneylaundering the iran-contra drug funds via the BCCI, the former U.S. Commissioner of Customs William von Raab said that when customs agents raided the bank in 1988, they found numerous CIA accounts. The CIA also worked with BCCI in arming and financing the Afghan mujahideen during the Afghan Waragainst the Soviet Union, using BCCI to launder proceeds from trafficking heroin grown in the Pakistan-Afghanistan borderlands, boosting the flow of narcotics to European and U.S. markets.
ccording to Peter Dale Scott, the Dirección Federal de Seguridad was in part a CIA creation, and "the CIA's closest government allies were for years in the DFS". DFS badges, "handed out to top-level Mexican drug-traffickers, have been labelled by DEA agents a virtual 'license to traffic.'" Scott says that "The Guadalajara Cartel, Mexico's most powerful drug-trafficking network in the early 1980s, prospered largely because it enjoyed the protection of the DFS, under its chief Miguel Nazar Haro, a CIA asset." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_CIA_drug_trafficking
ATF conspiracy, Fast and Furious-As more information on Operations Fast and Furious and Wide Receiver was revealed in 2011, Mexican officials, political commentators and media reacted with anger. Mexican officials stated in September that the U.S. government still had not briefed them on what went wrong nor had they apologized.
Due to several failed attempts at coordinating with Mexican law enforcement in the apprehension of suspected arms traffickers in the Wide Receiver and Hernandez cases, and concerns about widespread corruption, details of Operation Fast and Furious were not shared with Mexican government officials, and they were deliberately kept out of the loop after related firearms began turning up at crime scenes and in criminal arsenals in 2010. The U.S. Embassy in Mexico and the ATF Mexico City Office (MCO) were also kept in the dark. According to Attorney General of Mexico Marisela Morales, the Mexican government was told about the undercover program in January 2011, but they were not provided details at the time.
Morales stated, "At no time did we know or were we made aware that there might have been arms trafficking permitted. In no way would we have allowed it, because it is an attack on the safety of Mexicans." In addition, she expressed that allowing weapons to "walk" would represent a "betrayal" of Mexico. Morales said that her office would search "to the end" in order to clarify what happened in Fast and Furious. In November 2011, it was reported that the Mexican Attorney General's office was seeking the extradition of six citizens of the United States implicated with smuggling weapons. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATF_gunwalking_scandal
We officially moved into the next stage of the crisis today. AIG, likely under pressure from the administration, decided to come clean about where most of the bailout money was going. In apress release with several attachments, the struggling insurer detailed which counterparties had gotten about $100 billion of the bailout funds.
I added up the various lists provided by AIG by country (see below), and the results were quite revealing. About $44 billion went to counterparties headquartered in the U.S., such as Goldman Sachs and states such as California and Virginia.
But as I expected, the majority of the funds—$58 billion—went to banks headquartered outside the U.S. The big winners were French and German banks, which pulled in $19 billion and $17 billion respectively
In effect, the U.S. Treasury and Fed have been bailing out the rest of the world, to a massive degree. http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/economicsunbound/archives/20...
H.R. 347 (and it's companion senate bill S. 1794); aka the "Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011." Sounding more like an appropriations bill authorizing monies for federal grounds landscaping -- this bill, better known to those in the DC beltway as the 'Trespass Bill' -- potentially makes peaceable protest anywhere in the U.S. a federal felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeanine-molloff/trespass-bill_b_13282...
At least two American lawmakers have stated on the record that, in their opinion, Section 1031 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 legalizes or authorizes martial law in the United States. Senator Mark Udall stated "These provisions raise serious questions as to who we are as a society and what our Constitution seeks to protect...Section 1031 essentially repeals the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 by authorizing the U.S. military to perform law enforcement functions on American soil." [like removing due process and habeas corpus by allowing the US military to detain and/or kill US citizens. My added citation] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martial_law
All of this is repugnant to the US Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence. It must be concluded that these documents are no longer in force or have any effect. At the very least all of these acts committed by the de facto United States government would create a Constitutional crisis in a de jure jurisdiction. These historical documents are history.